MRA Community Forum

@Marinus-van-Deudekom roughly 50m (and the distance measured along the route from the red cross to point 2 is roughly 150m). But even if the distance from the roundabout to point 2 would be 1km the app would still think that I had reached point 2 there where I placed the red cross. Ideally the app would use distances along the route from your current position to the virtual on the route projected point. That the distance drops from 100 to 0 a little early is probably related to the fact that the app appears to use 100m as the accuracy for shaping points. Would be nice to get 10m accuracy when approaching a shaping point, just like for the destination (via point).

Voor android kan je deze gebruiken If you use an android phone, you can use this one to install an older version https://garmin-drive.en.uptodown.com/android/versions

@PedsOn2-0 said: It would be really cool if the yellow dot that ran the route in the video, looked like a motorcycle instead of a dot. And maybe we could even pick the color then too? Zal een leuke toevoeging zijn, geldt ook voor de navigatie pijl waar je bevind die de route volgt kon veranderen in een motor dan zie geen pijl maar een motor die de route volg zal een leuke toevoeging zijn, het is geen noodzaak maar meer om het op te vrolijken als aternatief, dan de standaard pijl.

[image: image.jpeg] Now, when I click on the “T”, I can see the labels. It wasn’t doing that 20 minutes ago

Will be fixed!

@MotoCon Dankjewel, ik heb hem nu.....

Thanks! This will be fixed today

Just my idea on the AI pricing model: If I compare the monthly fee for the AI subscription (€10 for 400 credits) with the price of additional credits (€6 for 250 credits), the cost per credit is essentially the same. I would prefer a pay-per-use model with prepaid credit packages. For this model, I would accept a slightly higher price per credit so that the subscription remains attractive for heavy users.

Een pauze kan je invoegen door het punt eerst te wijzigen naar "Via" [image: Screenshot 2026-11-10 at 06.45.15.png]

@Bert-Mulder sagte: Is it possible to upload one of my own routes to the AI-planner to compare it with one AI has made with the same the same information? That is something I like and do very often in my day-to-day job: comparing AI results by copying the same prompt into different models. I am not sure if this is possible, as I have not tested the feature at all, but I would be happy to see what the results of such a test would be.

thank you very much about highly appreciated features. I feel like it's Christmas time

@mzokk I didn't mean for my post to generate a critique for what's right/wrong with the XT. All navigation HW/SW has bugs, oddities or whatever you want to call them . The Garmin XT series is not immune. My main point is that if you know how the XTs (XT, XT2, XT3) work -- REALLY WORK, they're a perfectly good GPS solution. A properly constructed route in MRA or any other planner will execute correctly. The XTs don't screw up routes unless you've done something seriously wrong. Yet we get a parade of users who trash the units when it's instead operator error. Self-reflection is a much better solution in this realm. As far as your comments, with due respect, RUT is not a universal problem. I've been using Garmins (BMW Nav VI, Zumo XT, XT3) as my primary route execution devices over the past 8 years, and I've never experienced RUT. I know that it exists, but hitting it depends on how you execute off-route recalculations. I've personally always subscribed to what's outlined in post #30 of this excellent MRA forum topic, which you also contributed to: https://forum.myrouteapp.com/topic/11124/gpx-versions-1.1-vs-1.2-for-garmin-visually-explained/21?page=2 In short, I never turn auto recalculate on. I create routes to be ridden as created. I almost never deviate enough to need recalculations to continue back on-route. If I do, I have other approaches/tools to get back on track. The beauty of Garmins is that the route continues when you rejoin at a later point without having to recalculate anything. To me, this is one of the advantages of using an XT device for navigation. Your other "Bad" items don't register on my radar. The Tread app for the XT2/XT3 is excellent IF you configure it carefully/correctly when installed. Most users get in trouble because they install without understanding the pros/cons of the options available. I'm all for having debates and/or conversations when the people making complains understand the XT GPS units. Unfortunately, most of the time they don't.