MRA Community Forum

@Stevedo-6-0 After opening the link from @con-hennekens click on Navigation to go directly to the Navigation section. The wording may not say it skips all previous waypoints but it does state that the routes starts from the chosen waypoint. Here’s the bullet point: When starting, you can also start from a specific waypoint by pressing it on the map for a long time.

@b0hd1 Thanks very much - it's what I suspected. Think I'm going to pay up for a Carpe Iter Caretta - very expensive, but a solution that will work as I actually want.

The problem is very similar: but I never hear directions. I hope the problem is solved quickly.

To add to myself Very clever would be a feature that loads POI only within let's say 50 or 100km centered from your position, and it get's refreshed every minute or 5. I cannot imagine that to be more than a few 100, under normal circumstances, and they refresh pretty quick I guess.

@Herman-Veldhuizen said: As long as there is a way to a) hide points which are only created to shape the route and to b) auto skip other points which actually represent optional stops. Thats whats I need for my use cases, period. The most logical way is to have anoption to make via points auto-skippable so it makes a lot of sense. Your use case is rather special of course and not completely in line for what scenic riders need. It's more of a logistical feature. Personally, if I see the many questions about VIA points, I think such an option would raise much more confusion then there already is. Maybe a toggle on a shapingpoint to exclude it from the ETA information would help you?

@Paul-Stratton I was under the impression that update 5.1 from early May addressed this! https://forum.myrouteapp.com/topic/10907/update-5.1-carplay-android-auto-improvements-and-more

@ginogino of you have set those options in the settings of your phone. AA will act accordingly. So if you have the start from nearest point option on on your phone AA will do the same

Op dit moment kun je de omleiden functie nog niet gebruiken in een A2B route. Gaat nog wel komen

@Massimo-Cardone I hope for you all that the latest update (beta 480) will have solved this problem

I've got the same screen a few times during my 8 day trip to the Eiffel. At home I found out that somehow I've managed to uncheck the route sync box. When I checked that box again the error was gone

It is important to use the correct planning map for your navigation device. Each planning map comes with its own set of algorithms embedded within the map data to calculate which roads to use. The algorithms are unique to each planning map. After choosing the planning map you can also click Always use this map for new routes to set that map as your default planning map. From now on all new routes will be created using the chosen planning map. My screenshot below shows the planning map from HERE is selected and also the option to Always use this map for new routes. The overlay maps are separate to the planning maps and have no effect on route calculations. Think of them as clear sheets with extra information that you place over the top of the planning map. The planning map underneath does all of the route calculations. So with the planning map selected you can then use any of the overlay maps. If you do not see the same blue menu bar with the planning maps that is shown in my screenshot, click Page menu first and then all of the same options will be available to you. [image: 1784010358545-863820c3-ab46-4fb5-a499-d72f58a7354d-image.jpeg]

In the online routeplanner "Windows Explorer" layout you can easily rename routes by clicking on the pencil button. [image: 1784009017270-165b4858-451b-466b-97ff-2c709e731b4e-image.jpeg]

@Sjoerd-Spieker My current solution is to add the routedistance to every route name. IMO this is very good practice especially if you share routes with friends or other riders who use different navigation systems When they load the route they can very easily see if their navigation system has correctly calculated the route by comparing their navigations systems calculated mileage to the mileage in the file name I still add the mileage to my route names as a check that the MRA app is actually loading & calculating the route I planned with the MRA web planner! IMO on a 6" phone screen there is not enough space for any additional columns for mileage or time & certainly not for both

I do not share that experience. For me also curvy routes work fine, in online as well as offline mode. Could it be that you are missing map segments? Or try to start from a location too far from a public road?

@Dave-J-0 Extremely pleased to read that! Cannot yet indicate when we will implement those in CarPlay! Isn't top priority now but we definitely want to have it done just for the sake of keeping things in line (like we recently did).

@jomar59 : Du schreibst bitte mal den Service an über ein Ticket und erklärt was Du genau möchtest. Dann gibt es eine Angepasste Lösung bestimmt für Euch. VG [image: 1783928687952-img_0290.jpeg]

This is just an adapter to flexibly rotate the original BMW bracket by 90 ". The display is a sep. Topic. Which display can be horizontal and vertical and still compatible with the WW has to be clarified by someone else. A CP or AA display can also be operated with the glove finger not everyone needs the WW,

@Brian-McG @brian-mcg You're right. This has nothing directly to do with transferring files other than it being one of the pieces that ensure Zumos operate correctly as navigation devices. If that doesn't interest you, so be it. BTW, Garmin GPS routing algorithms have changed over the years, pre-Zumo you could take a Basecamp route calculation to the bank in that it would 100% match when recalculated in the Garmin GPS. That's no longer the case. I'm surprised you didn't know this given your "mult-multi years" Garmin experience. To the topic, this discussion has everything to do with: The HERE map not placing the road where it actually is. The MRA app recognizing the map discrepancy, but the Web Routeplanner not showing any overt alert. Sync should actually mean Sync. The MRA "Skip Waypoints automatically" enabled not working in this scenario. I was able to dynamically enable the XT3 to successfully recalculate at WP#7, so what's with the blanket "advice not to enable the recalculate function is decades old"? Nothing is absolute, yet you're hanging your hat on it. Odd. I'm trying to be transparent and reasonable, and I can say with complete honestly that the XT3 worked better than the MRA app in successfully routing the section from WP#7 to WP#8. If this had not been a verification test, and I was just routing with the XT3 (forgetting the app), I probably wouldn't have known there was a problem at all. I would have been on the straighter section on top of the mountain ridge before being able to look down at the route, and I wouldn't have seen that the XT3 handled the situation without any intervention. Again, thank you for helping me unravel what happened. We obviously don't agree on some things, but I appreciate the input you provided.

WenPlanung [image: 1783844722389-img_0241.jpeg] In der MRA Navi App Next [image: 1783844746640-img_0242.jpeg]