@guenniguenzelsen Quite often I had the same experience when using MRA NN on my AA device. Because of this I always have a second nav-app installed: TomTom Go or OSMAND. Lately I always stop the navigation when I have a break/stop. You do get a small window which asks if you want to cancel or proceed with the navigation. I leave that window open and before driving off I select the proceed option. Until now I didn't have the issue anymore. But I must say that I haven't done an extensive test yet.

@warren.mallettoutlook.com I don’t think Asia is very well mapped by HERE but I could be wrong.

@Herman-Veldhuizen said in App behaviour when in offline mode at a construction site: a:The global setting 'Offline navigation'. In my view, the “offline” global setting means that there is absolutely no internet connection, that there is no SIM card in the device, and that in the morning at the hotel, neither Wi-Fi nor a hotspot is used for updates. b: The route level toggle 'Use offline/online maps'. I haven’t been able to figure out exactly what’s going on yet, but it seems odd to me that when I tap the ‘offline navigation’ option in orange, it switches back to ‘online navigation’ in the main settings. @Herman-Veldhuizen said in App behaviour when in offline mode at a construction site: The in-app route editor assumes that you navigate a route as route. It doesn't use 2). So when you navigate a route as track you don't get the same route as in the editor. I can’t currently confirm this for myself: when I place two devices side by side (both are online), with one device is set to ‘Route as Track’ and the other device is set to ‘Route as Route’, I see the same route when I open it (even before I press ‘Navigate). @Herman-Veldhuizen said in App behaviour when in offline mode at a construction site: Closures are always ignored in the opening page of a route. So what you see in the opening page might not correspond to what you see in the route editor or while navigating. ‘That seems logical to me, though, as only the planned route is displayed when you open the app, and it’s only when you start navigation that the road closures (according to Here) are taken into account, and the route is then naturally adjusted to avoid them.’ ‘That’s exactly how it should be.’ What strikes me about offline navigation, however, is that when I call up the route (with the settings set to ‘Route as Route’) and press Start, I can’t see any change to the route; it navigates as if I were using ‘Route as Track’. That’s why I’d like to better understand the difference between an ‘offline’ route (set to ‘Route as Route’) and an ‘online’ route (set to ‘Route as Track’). What is also noticeable when calling up ‘Route as Track’ online is that the route is navigated as planned, but warning messages appear on the map indicating that the route might be closed, for example. With offline navigation using ‘Route as Route’, these warnings do not appear. Perhaps someone is able to define the difference precisely.

@Corjan-Meijerink Ik heb gisteren alle combinaties geprobeerd, na de nieuwe installatie staan ze weer op de standaard waarden, vermoed ik.

Thanks, Ill try that!

i agree with peter. a solution would be give option to recalculate off. i understand that in a2b recalculation is always on. even if you stick on route on a selected route/track ( track if it is curved) in a few situations the app thinks it is off route/track

@reinier.beenengmail.com, nee ik zou niets anders adviseren, hooguit een app die gericht is op logistieke navigatie misschien. Het skip algoritme is ingericht op scenic navigatie.

@Jörgen Yes, I stated it in the title and body

I think you have to distinguish between two scenarios when faced with sudden road closures. On minor roads, you can try to bypass the closure ‘by sight’. It’s not the most elegant solution, but it’s doable. On the motorway, this is more difficult, as the map showing the route scrolls off the small display. If the app now wants to divert me at the next exit, I don’t know whether it’s trying to take me back or whether that’s a way back onto the route (somewhere past the closure). That’s why I think it’s so important to be able to mark a closure in some way (e.g. by pressing a button), so that the app definitely doesn’t try to take that exit again.

@Nick-Carthew Nee, niet gelukt was aan het rijden

@Corjan-Meijerink Thanks for your answer. I can sleep better now and are awaiting version 5.1.

I did my first ride of the year today and used verion 5.0.4 (451). Till the lunch the audio seems fine, but i'm not sure. I did not pay much attention to it. After the lunch i noticed a missing part at the beginning of the instructions. My audio delay was already set to 1 sec. Therefore i started playing with the delay and hoped to hear some difference. I did hear differences but not what i expected. I did not matter if I set the delay to 0 or 2 seconds. The first small part of the directions was always missing. The only thing what happens was the delay when the instructions were spoken. With the of 2 sec delay, the instructions came 2 seconds later. B.t.w I have a Sena SRL 3 headset.

See this: https://forum.myrouteapp.com/post/76000 Getting there with a little patience while waiting for HERE

The issue has been identified. Unfortunately the HERE SDK is the cause They have fixed it in a recent update but that version contains another issue causing us definitely not to update just yet. Developers informed me that the blocking (other) issue is solved in their next update so hopefully it’s available soon

Hi, I agree with Macro. When I'm riding my motorcycle, my eyes have to be on the road. However, nobody is talking about exceeding speed limits. Since you mention it, there are also navigation apps that warn you both on the screen and with sound if you've exceeded the speed limit, apart from speed cameras. It's simply a matter of implementing a function that's already available in other navigation apps like Sygic, for example. My only intention is to improve the app, not to say that one navigation app is better than another. Sorry for my English; I use Google.

@Philippe-Veys said in Start route bij dichtstbijzijnde routepunt werkt niet: I don't use the routes as tracks. I think you do, you just don't know when a track is a track, so This must be a bug in the system 🥴 no it is no bug... Everything you do with roundtrip generator or curvy routes actually IS a track.

@RainerT said in Next+ 1st impressions: I’m known for plastering the whole screen with stuff, but you started it… :-)) Haha! Actually at first I thought: TL;DR, but then I saw Nick his upvote and decided to pull through because if Nick upvotes there must be something interesting . And I agree.

Yes of course I can put notes in but if it is a quick visit to a city and there is one each day I don’t always want to do all that work. If I select via points then the app should let me see their names. As for whether it’s the best tool: actually Outdooractive is better for routing but they don’t show the waypoints at all - not even a dot on the path - so that’s even more useless for city walks!

@Herman-Veldhuizen, eens. Je krijgt altijd een herhaling van de laatste gesproken aanwijzing als je op het tegeltje links boven drukt. Maar aangezien bij het starten van een route er niks te herhalen valt, werkt dat in dit geval ook niet. "Route <naam van de route> gestart." lijkt me wel wat