Expert Review of route
-
wrote on 26 Jan 2025, 18:57 last edited by
Many have helped me understand the Garmin Zumo XT and GPX 1.1 vs 1.2 which has been very helpful.
A few helped me through a "seasonal closures" routing issue.
I have completed the Day 1 of what will be a 3 day trip in June. Would anyone be willing to review it and offer any suggestions? Good, Bad or indifferent?
-
Many have helped me understand the Garmin Zumo XT and GPX 1.1 vs 1.2 which has been very helpful.
A few helped me through a "seasonal closures" routing issue.
I have completed the Day 1 of what will be a 3 day trip in June. Would anyone be willing to review it and offer any suggestions? Good, Bad or indifferent?
Instructor RouteXperts administratorwrote on 26 Jan 2025, 19:28 last edited by Hans van de Ven MR.MRAUse maximum 28 via points in a route otherwise the XT will split the route
Why all green points?
-
Many have helped me understand the Garmin Zumo XT and GPX 1.1 vs 1.2 which has been very helpful.
A few helped me through a "seasonal closures" routing issue.
I have completed the Day 1 of what will be a 3 day trip in June. Would anyone be willing to review it and offer any suggestions? Good, Bad or indifferent?
wrote on 27 Jan 2025, 09:18 last edited by@Greenham Try and use other colors and icons for different activities. Use less via points and more droplets (shaping points).
This is how I did one of the touring days for this summer in the Swiss Alps: https://www.myrouteapp.com/en/social/route/10178038?mode=share -
wrote on 27 Jan 2025, 10:43 last edited by richtea999
[not an expert, but like to give an opinion...
]What happened to lunch?!
Points look nice and accurate, and not positioned too close to junctions, etc. Good work there.
If you set a realistic start time like 9:00 that always helps gauge progress, and when you might want to stop for a rest/petrol, etc.
If you're riding with others then check around point 40 for TomTom users - they may get sent a different way (west towards Afton and then north to McCormick Gap Overlook Calf Mountain Overlook - which could be a nicer alternative route, but I don't know the area).
-
[not an expert, but like to give an opinion...
]What happened to lunch?!
Points look nice and accurate, and not positioned too close to junctions, etc. Good work there.
If you set a realistic start time like 9:00 that always helps gauge progress, and when you might want to stop for a rest/petrol, etc.
If you're riding with others then check around point 40 for TomTom users - they may get sent a different way (west towards Afton and then north to McCormick Gap Overlook Calf Mountain Overlook - which could be a nicer alternative route, but I don't know the area).
wrote on 27 Jan 2025, 14:06 last edited by@richtea999
Thanks for looking at what I had.This is just day 1 of the trip. Day 2 I stay and do some sightseeing , and day 3 I haven't posted yet. I wanted to use the advice on this segment.
I thought about the route you highlighted. But this goes through some of the hard hit areas from last years Hurricane. Thats why I avoided getting onto the BRP sooner.
I'm traveling solo and basically any fuel stations after 100 miles is getting a visit
-
Use maximum 28 via points in a route otherwise the XT will split the route
Why all green points?
wrote on 27 Jan 2025, 14:11 last edited by@Hans-van-de-Ven-MR-MRA
This brings me back to the GARMIN ZUMO XT and how it reacts to these routes.
When you import the route and then start the route it "calculates" the route based on its own Garmin algorithms.
As I understand Via vs Shaping points. Garmin IGNORS Shaping points and ONLY cares about VIA points during its calculations when importing the route. That why so many VIA points.
I'm trying to stay on a fairly specific set of roads. If I reduce VIA points won't/can't Garmin then pick the roads that will most quickly get me to the next VIA point.?
Maybe I have it wrong
-
@Hans-van-de-Ven-MR-MRA
This brings me back to the GARMIN ZUMO XT and how it reacts to these routes.
When you import the route and then start the route it "calculates" the route based on its own Garmin algorithms.
As I understand Via vs Shaping points. Garmin IGNORS Shaping points and ONLY cares about VIA points during its calculations when importing the route. That why so many VIA points.
I'm trying to stay on a fairly specific set of roads. If I reduce VIA points won't/can't Garmin then pick the roads that will most quickly get me to the next VIA point.?
Maybe I have it wrong
Shaping points (soft points) can be skipped without the Garmin sending you back to a skipped shaping point.
You must visit via points (hard points) or skip them manually.
Only start a route if you:
Have a connection with at least 3 satellites,
Are on the route or are close to the route.
Never start a route in the garage or at the kitchen table, because then the Zumo has to calculate to your starting point.
Again, use a maximum of 28 via points and place them at critical points or where you want to stop. For the rest, just use shaping points. I myself use a maximum of 7 via points in my route and form the route with sufficient shaping points. -
Shaping points (soft points) can be skipped without the Garmin sending you back to a skipped shaping point.
You must visit via points (hard points) or skip them manually.
Only start a route if you:
Have a connection with at least 3 satellites,
Are on the route or are close to the route.
Never start a route in the garage or at the kitchen table, because then the Zumo has to calculate to your starting point.
Again, use a maximum of 28 via points and place them at critical points or where you want to stop. For the rest, just use shaping points. I myself use a maximum of 7 via points in my route and form the route with sufficient shaping points.wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 00:11 last edited by@Hans-van-de-Ven-MR-MRA
Thank you,
I can reduce the hard points and use more soft points.
But
QUESTION .... Does the Zumo XT use the soft points when its calculating the route using the route I want to take.
-
@Hans-van-de-Ven-MR-MRA
Thank you,
I can reduce the hard points and use more soft points.
But
QUESTION .... Does the Zumo XT use the soft points when its calculating the route using the route I want to take.
@Greenham
Yes -
@Hans-van-de-Ven-MR-MRA
Thank you,
I can reduce the hard points and use more soft points.
But
QUESTION .... Does the Zumo XT use the soft points when its calculating the route using the route I want to take.
@Greenham The XT has a nasty habbit of thinking it can make a better route then the one you planned. To force the XT to do what YOU want add extra shapingpoints. Use the compare function in the planning mode to see what TomTom and OSM do whit your route. It gives you a small inside of what might happen to your route if you didn't put in enough shapingpoints
-
wrote on 29 Jan 2025, 10:00 last edited by Guzt
- only use shaping points (hands) where relevant (fuel stop, coffee stop, lunch stop etc...) and use different colours accordingly.
- once your route finished with the car activity profile using the HERE map set, optimise it by changing route calculation from fastest (standard) to shortest and adjust to original. Switch back to fastest and adjust again if necessary.
- if wanted, now you may switch to the TT map set and do the same.
- use the gpx 1.1 (route, track poi) for your XT.
- you can leave the recalculation mode on your Garmin device to automatic without any problem.
-
- only use shaping points (hands) where relevant (fuel stop, coffee stop, lunch stop etc...) and use different colours accordingly.
- once your route finished with the car activity profile using the HERE map set, optimise it by changing route calculation from fastest (standard) to shortest and adjust to original. Switch back to fastest and adjust again if necessary.
- if wanted, now you may switch to the TT map set and do the same.
- use the gpx 1.1 (route, track poi) for your XT.
- you can leave the recalculation mode on your Garmin device to automatic without any problem.
@Guzt
Just for clarity, Via points are hand shaped not shaping points. -
- only use shaping points (hands) where relevant (fuel stop, coffee stop, lunch stop etc...) and use different colours accordingly.
- once your route finished with the car activity profile using the HERE map set, optimise it by changing route calculation from fastest (standard) to shortest and adjust to original. Switch back to fastest and adjust again if necessary.
- if wanted, now you may switch to the TT map set and do the same.
- use the gpx 1.1 (route, track poi) for your XT.
- you can leave the recalculation mode on your Garmin device to automatic without any problem.
@Guzt If you use recalculate on on the XT you're in for trouble. sooner or later the thing will for shure mess up your carefully planned route. The XT has a will of its own. So my advise is leave it of.
when using the 1.2 export using the Drive app. The route, witch must have some viapoints in it, will be shown on your XT. I alway project the track witch comes automaticly with the 1.2 export under the route so if you deviate dfrom the route you can still come back to the route using your eyes. If you have recalculate on, that would bee the chance for the XT to mess up your route and believe me it will for shure.
have fun -
- only use shaping points (hands) where relevant (fuel stop, coffee stop, lunch stop etc...) and use different colours accordingly.
- once your route finished with the car activity profile using the HERE map set, optimise it by changing route calculation from fastest (standard) to shortest and adjust to original. Switch back to fastest and adjust again if necessary.
- if wanted, now you may switch to the TT map set and do the same.
- use the gpx 1.1 (route, track poi) for your XT.
- you can leave the recalculation mode on your Garmin device to automatic without any problem.
wrote on 29 Jan 2025, 20:41 last edited by@Guzt said in Expert Review of route:
- only use shaping points (hands) where relevant (fuel stop, coffee stop, lunch stop etc...) and use different colours accordingly.
- once your route finished with the car activity profile using the HERE map set, optimise it by changing route calculation from fastest (standard) to shortest and adjust to original. Switch back to fastest and adjust again if necessary.
- if wanted, now you may switch to the TT map set and do the same.
- use the gpx 1.1 (route, track poi) for your XT.
- you can leave the recalculation mode on your Garmin device to automatic without any problem.
#1 Shaping vs Via points. Got that. Only use VIA points where you actually want to stop.
#2 Heres where I get confused by your comment, I started with the motorcycle profile and the (Here) default. How do I optimize changing from fastest to shortest
I don't understand the back and forth of fastest and shortest
I have compared the route with TT in the past
#3 I just learned from you guys recently to use GPX 1.1
#4 I understand the Leave recalculation on the Zumo to automatic
-
@Guzt said in Expert Review of route:
- only use shaping points (hands) where relevant (fuel stop, coffee stop, lunch stop etc...) and use different colours accordingly.
- once your route finished with the car activity profile using the HERE map set, optimise it by changing route calculation from fastest (standard) to shortest and adjust to original. Switch back to fastest and adjust again if necessary.
- if wanted, now you may switch to the TT map set and do the same.
- use the gpx 1.1 (route, track poi) for your XT.
- you can leave the recalculation mode on your Garmin device to automatic without any problem.
#1 Shaping vs Via points. Got that. Only use VIA points where you actually want to stop.
#2 Heres where I get confused by your comment, I started with the motorcycle profile and the (Here) default. How do I optimize changing from fastest to shortest
I don't understand the back and forth of fastest and shortest
I have compared the route with TT in the past
#3 I just learned from you guys recently to use GPX 1.1
#4 I understand the Leave recalculation on the Zumo to automatic
wrote on 29 Jan 2025, 21:27 last edited by@Greenham download this document from my google drive for full explanation
[link text]https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Zwt-5yrJSFWJCLw-997z3XFbFyAUY6en/view?usp=drive_link(link url) -
@Guzt If you use recalculate on on the XT you're in for trouble. sooner or later the thing will for shure mess up your carefully planned route. The XT has a will of its own. So my advise is leave it of.
when using the 1.2 export using the Drive app. The route, witch must have some viapoints in it, will be shown on your XT. I alway project the track witch comes automaticly with the 1.2 export under the route so if you deviate dfrom the route you can still come back to the route using your eyes. If you have recalculate on, that would bee the chance for the XT to mess up your route and believe me it will for shure.
have funwrote on 29 Jan 2025, 21:28 last edited by@Marinus-van-Deudekom Did I mentioned to use 1.2? Don't think so.
-
Many have helped me understand the Garmin Zumo XT and GPX 1.1 vs 1.2 which has been very helpful.
A few helped me through a "seasonal closures" routing issue.
I have completed the Day 1 of what will be a 3 day trip in June. Would anyone be willing to review it and offer any suggestions? Good, Bad or indifferent?
wrote on 29 Jan 2025, 21:42 last edited byThis is great. I won't pretend to understand why you have to save as a track, then load it and compare with the Route, but I will do it.
In the Motorcycle profile it does allow me to route optimize. Or is it doing nothing.
I used Chat GPT to create an English version if you want it.
THANK YOU AGAIN
-
@Marinus-van-Deudekom Did I mentioned to use 1.2? Don't think so.
wrote on 29 Jan 2025, 21:44 last edited byYou say in the doc when downloading to Garmin to do it in. 1.1 format
-
@Guzt said in Expert Review of route:
- only use shaping points (hands) where relevant (fuel stop, coffee stop, lunch stop etc...) and use different colours accordingly.
- once your route finished with the car activity profile using the HERE map set, optimise it by changing route calculation from fastest (standard) to shortest and adjust to original. Switch back to fastest and adjust again if necessary.
- if wanted, now you may switch to the TT map set and do the same.
- use the gpx 1.1 (route, track poi) for your XT.
- you can leave the recalculation mode on your Garmin device to automatic without any problem.
#1 Shaping vs Via points. Got that. Only use VIA points where you actually want to stop.
#2 Heres where I get confused by your comment, I started with the motorcycle profile and the (Here) default. How do I optimize changing from fastest to shortest
I don't understand the back and forth of fastest and shortest
I have compared the route with TT in the past
#3 I just learned from you guys recently to use GPX 1.1
#4 I understand the Leave recalculation on the Zumo to automatic
wrote on 29 Jan 2025, 21:45 last edited by@Greenham In the toolkit under optimize you have the possibility to change the route calculation. That option is only available in the HERE map set when you make your route using the car/auto mobile profile.
You can either add a copy of the route (hamburger menu - routes - add) or make the track underlying (which I prefer) visible as reference (I already have an uploaded track of the route as I make all my routes mostly in Basecamp).
When one recalculates with shorter distance e.g. the route will differ from the original. By dragging the recalculated route to the track or reference route, you force the route to follow the original as intended. Hence the reason that one can leave auto-calculation to on on the gps when using gpx 1.1 -
@Greenham In the toolkit under optimize you have the possibility to change the route calculation. That option is only available in the HERE map set when you make your route using the car/auto mobile profile.
You can either add a copy of the route (hamburger menu - routes - add) or make the track underlying (which I prefer) visible as reference (I already have an uploaded track of the route as I make all my routes mostly in Basecamp).
When one recalculates with shorter distance e.g. the route will differ from the original. By dragging the recalculated route to the track or reference route, you force the route to follow the original as intended. Hence the reason that one can leave auto-calculation to on on the gps when using gpx 1.1wrote on 29 Jan 2025, 22:24 last edited byThank you again. I finally did it. I used your steps and saw 1 or 2 places that the track and the rote did not align. Fixed that, changed to shortest, no issues, exported to my Garmin in 1.1 Route.Track.POI
I've learned a much from you. Thank you
Mike
Here is the English version of your instructions
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1khcVV8Wp56ploC0WzzSaf3bm-no57mve?usp=drive_link
