@drabslab said in Navigating via MRA Navigation...:
I would not blame the users for making incorrect statements supposing that they work from their personal experience with the tool, and are not posting lies just for the sake of trolling.
I am not saying that people are trolling, I just say that untrue statements are being made and that some other people will be misinformed by them.
@matt-flaming said in Navigating via MRA Navigation...:
So people that paid for a product, didn't get the product that they PAID for, AS IT WAS ADVERTISED, should just STFU and deal with it? With no complaints at all? How FANBOYISH of you. WOW. Man, you really need to realize that this forum isn't for praising the MRA gods, it's for helping make the product better and to help others. If nobody talked about the issues and shortcomings, it would never get better.
It is not intended for bashing either. It is a subscription. If I subscribe to a newspaper, and after some time I realize I don't like it I simply unsubscribe. Simple as that. I can only say I DID get the product I paid for, I like it a lot, I prefer it above all TomTom's and Garmins. Yes there are some quirks, as do all TomTom's and Garmins have.
@con-hennekens said in Navigating via MRA Navigation...:
Yes, there is, it is called events.
This is absolutely not a proper solution for organization of routes. Events are not intended for that purpose. If that feature was intended for that purpose it wouldn't be called "EVENTS"
It is ABSOLUTELY intended for the purpose of organizing your routes that belong to each other.