App behaviour when in offline mode at a construction site

[Peter Zehentreiter]

I have a question about road closures shown on Here Maps in relation to offline navigation.

Last Sunday, I was driving ‘online’ from Italy to Germany via Cortina d’Ampezzo.
According to the Here map, the road was closed, but in reality the roadworks had already finished; however, the app prevented me from taking the planned route.....

What happens if I navigate ‘offline’? Will the app still try to reroute me, or can I follow the planned route without any notifications from the app?

Does anyone have any experience with this? I’ve always navigated online up to now, so I don’t have any experience with this.

[Peter Zehentreiter]

Already figured out that there is no big difference....

The only thing which helps, is to deactivate route violation and switch to navigate route as a track.

Have a nice sunny weekend

[Lex.Kloet.RX]

Or just follow the road and do nothing

[Peter Zehentreiter]

@Lex.Kloet.RX Yeah, sure, that’s an option, of course, but the constant reminders that I should take a different route because I’m supposedly not allowed to drive through the roadworks are incredibly annoying......

[Brian McG]

@Peter-Zehentreiter you worked out a solution,
it is similar to the way I use MRA so that I get to ride the route I planned, I use offline mode & route as track,
this way there are no disturbances to the route unless I go off route & the app then tries to get me back on the track

yes I know this has the disadvantage of not getting the latest up to date road closure/traffic information but I am on a bike & traffic is not really such an issue & even a lot of "road closures" can be got through on a bike

I do mitigate the issue of road closures, normally at breakfast in the hotel, by going onlline & checking if the app does try to add any route changes before I set off,
but when I set off the route is reloaded with navigation is offline & as a track

[Peter Zehentreiter]

@Brian-McG said in App behaviour when in offline mode at a construction site:

I use offline mode & route as track,
this way there are no disturbances

When doing the same just online there shouldn't be disturbances as well...... ( I `ll try)

Concerning getting the latest information about traffic or construction areas.....I`ll see when trying the Route as a track.what will happen online.

Sometimes there are up to 10 other riders following me, so I like to know in advance where the road leads or at least be sure that the road I choose is suitable for the others.

So far, though, I’ve always managed to reach my destination

[M. Schrijver]

MRA and traffic info is not the best combination. From my TomTom app i know it can be a good thing the traffic info corrects the route. It "saves" me more often than it annoyed me.
But not always the traffic info and roadclosures are proper alligned.

[Peter Zehentreiter]

@M.-Schrijver Yes, sometimes it’s a curse and sometimes it’s a blessing.

For the ‘Route as Track’ feature, the settings explicitly state that it works best online.

I’ll give it a go and let you know the results here.....

[AWDC LAO]

Our experience: in 98% of the cases, when a road is closed, you can go further with a bike.

[Peter Zehentreiter]

@AWDC-LAO Thanks for pointing that out but that’s not the issue....

It annoys me when the Here map shows a roadworks site... even though it’s actually already finished, and the app keeps nagging me to turn around.

[Brian McG]

@Peter-Zehentreiter sorry my previous post was maybe not 100% clear,
when I navigate "offline" I truly mean "offline" as in airplane mode,
yes MRA is in "offline" mode but also my phone has no input connections except for GPS & bluetooth to my headset,
hence the only disturbance I can get to the path of my route is a bad GPS position or if I deviate from the path

re: "For the ‘Route as Track’ feature, the settings explicitly state that it works best online."
This may be due to this track display issue https://forum.myrouteapp.com/post/66551

[Peter Zehentreiter]

@Brian-McG No problem, I’ve already understood what you meant about offline use.

I get on really well with MRA and am really happy with it; it’s just the occasionally outdated road closures in the Here map that are a bit of a nuisance (though that’s not MRA’s fault).

In any case, I’m testing the ‘Route as Track’ feature both online and offline… and forming my own opinion.

Everyone has different needs, and the app definitely tries to cover everything as best it can.

The icing on the cake would be if MRA used Google maps, including their up-to-date information.....

‘We’re allowed to dream’

[Herman Veldhuizen]

@Peter-Zehentreiter Very valid question.

In the app it seems to depends on:

1. where you are in the app : In-app route editor, opening page of a route or during navigating.
2. The global setting 'Navigate route as tracks'.
3. a:The global setting 'Offline navigation'.
   b: The route level toggle 'Use offline/online maps'.

I have observed the following issues/behaviours but it is unclear to me wether these are caused by map issues, app issues or wether they are supposed to be like that.

A) 3a and 3b seem to be related: changing one also changes the other. The fact that the app changes the global setting is a bit confusing. I suggest to make the route level toggle a temporary one.

B) The in-app route editor assumes that you navigate a route as route. It doesn't use 2). So when you navigate a route as track you don't get the same route as in the editor.

C) Closures are sometimes ignored in offline mode (even if they are available in the offline map). Is it an error in the map or in the app? Don't know.

D) Closures are always ignored in the opening page of a route. So what you see in the opening page might not correspond to what you see in the route editor or while navigating.

E) Closures CAN be ignored when navigating a route as track. It has surprised me that the way you navigate a route controls how closures are handled. It also depends on Where you press Navigate : from the opening page of a route or from the in-app route editor. That there is a difference here must be a bug.