Routing issue

[Jörgen]

Sorry wrong forum area, please move.

[Marinus van Deudekom]

@Hubert-Thoring it can't happen that all those points were skipped automatically. Must be something else

[Stefan Hummelink]

@Jörgen So if I understand correctly:

• You drive from (via)point 1 to the red circle...
• Then you drove back to viapoint 1 to park behind your house and drop of the thing you picked up...
• Then when you got back to your bike to ride the route you found it had skipped to (via)point 26...

If so, I think the auto skip algorithm determined that after a certain time of driving from the red circle back to (via)point 1, that you did NOT intend to drive the remaining part of the route and concluded through some programmed logic, that (via)point 26 was the next one to go to.

This is a typical edge case of something that practically will not occur very often. My question is though: if you intended to drive back to your house in the first place, why not start the route when you were to leave the house for the 2nd time? It is sort of challenging the auto skip algorithm in a unrealistic way haha.

Please note that my analysis is based solely on my assumptions that I started my reply with.

[Jörgen]

@Stefan-Hummelink sagte:

@Jörgen So if I understand correctly:

• You drive from (via)point 1 to the red circle...
• Then you drove back to viapoint 1 to park behind your house and drop of the thing you picked up...
• Then when you got back to your bike to ride the route you found it had skipped to (via)point 26...

If so, I think the auto skip algorithm determined that after a certain time of driving from the red circle back to (via)point 1, that you did NOT intend to drive the remaining part of the route and concluded through some programmed logic, that (via)point 26 was the next one to go to.

This is a typical edge case of something that practically will not occur very often. My question is though: if you intended to drive back to your house in the first place, why not start the route when you were to leave the house for the 2nd time? It is sort of challenging the auto skip algorithm in a unrealistic way haha.

Please note that my analysis is based solely on my assumptions that I started my reply with.

No, I drove from WP 1 to the red circle (Post Office) because it was on the route anyway, parked behind the post office (about 10m from the main street), and drove back to main street on the assumption that I would then continue further to the left towards WP 2.
Then Navigation Next switched to WP 26.

Auto skip is switched off.

[Jörgen]

@Marinus-van-Deudekom sagte:

@Hubert-Thoring it can't happen that all those points were skipped automatically. Must be something else

May be. I try to understand.

[Stefan Hummelink]

@Jörgen In that case this is something voor mr. C himself to look at!

[Jörgen]

Hi, I could reproduce the problem. I started the route on iPhone and Android device. When I left the post office i drove back and in the same moment navigation changed from next WP 2 to the last WP.
So it is reproducible.

iPhone

Android

[LennyO]

@Jörgen Interesting and very weird....
BTW, how did you get the V.6 Nav on your Android?
I am on the Beta team and would like to test the Nav as well.
Thx!

[Jörgen]

Hi, do you have any other version? On iOS or Android?

[Hubert Thoring]

I also tested it:

• iOS mobile phone 16e with iOS 27.0.1

• MRA V6.0.0 (526)

• Route planned in HERE.

• WP automatically skip "OFF"

• Recalculation "IN"

• Route Start

So the incident that can be repeated:

Started at WP1

Then left broken off...

After about 250m to the right to the green POI

• So leave the route

• Then back to the route

But now deliberately turned wrong to the left, so not to the right to WP2

• The app has indicated after about 50m that WP 2-4 were skipped, and this route made white..?

• Next is the target WP5

Actually, the app should have told me please turn to get to WP2 ?!?

After the stop, reported directly here

[Jörgen]

Ok, thanks for confirming.

@corjan-meijerink please have a look.