How to navigate a track?

[Martin Wilcke]

@Bouke-Ent said in How to navigate a track?:

poi from a track

If you're talking about a GPX file, there are no "POIs from a track" - there are POIs (<wpt>) and Tracks (<trk>) as separate elements.

You can import a Track as route-track (or tracklog) and you can import POIs - but not both in one go.

[Bouke Ent]

@Martin-Wilcke said in How to navigate a track?:

@Bouke-Ent said in How to navigate a track?:

poi from a track

If you're talking about a GPX file, there are no "POIs from a track" - there are POIs (<wpt>) and Tracks (<trk>) as separate elements.

You can import a Track as route-track (or tracklog) and you can import POIs - but not both in one go.

when export you have option track and poi. when i read in notepad i see track info and i see the poi info as wpt coordinates and poi name. so export is correct.

if i import it again in mra the track is correct but poi are not there.

did yesterday small test with mra next and same result.

for me it would be nice to drive on a track. in some countries OSM is better the HERE for small roads or path. with this option MRA Next use will be more flexibale for me. be able to add poi would be a very nice option to add extra information to track.

on my zumo xt it was easy to show track on map. but also there i was not able to get poi info on map.

i believe not many people will or would use this function but for me it would be nice..

i am now already happy with free ride as extra option to drive a track.. before i did swith over to osmand if osm find a path but here did not know roads.

[Con Hennekens]

@Bouke-Ent said in How to navigate a track?:

link to other post is not totaly the same.

No, it is not the same because you changed subject mid-thread here.

[Bouke Ent]

@Con-Hennekens said in How to navigate a track?:

@Bouke-Ent said in How to navigate a track?:

link to other post is not totaly the same.

No, it is not the same because you changed subject mid-thread here.

ok, then i read other in a other way. that is why i ask it.

i did not want to change this topic. in my believe topic was how to ride a track with one off the option to import track and ride it in free mode .
still because off this topic i found out this option of show track on screen in free ride. i did this before in bike mode but there was no speed.

i will leave this topic and i want to give big thanks to TS to show me this option.

[Martin Wilcke]

@Bouke-Ent said in How to navigate a track?:

f i import it again in mra the track is correct but poi are not there.

The features for GPX import and export are different:

You can export a route, a track and POIs in one go by using "save as gpx1.1 (route, track, poi)".

But you can only import either route(s), track(s) or POIs from a GPX at a time.

Routes and tracks are imported to your Routes Library, while POIs appear in your POI Library (you have to create or open a route to get access to them).

[Guzzist]

Hi everyone, this discussion is drifting in an unintended direction. May the header is misleading? My first post was simply meant to describe the situation, and ended with a simple question: why.
Of course, this was implied with the hope, that there would be a future development that treats imports and exports equally.

By the way: I am very familiar with all the features of MRA Routeplanner, MRA Navigation and GPX standard.

The background to my question is this: at many prominent events, the organizers provide a GPX file containing one or more tracks. This ensures that all participants get the same result on their different navigation devices (since routes always turn out differently!).
The GPX file often includes additional necessary locations - which aren’t necessarily part of the track - but may also be situated somewhat off to the path. For example: checkpoints, bivouacs, gas- or water sources, etc.

These were established when the GPX format was created in the last century by the company TopoGrafix - and exists in the same way until today.
If you look into a GPX file that contains such points, they stand alone and are not related to a route or track. They are called waypoints and are labeled as <wpt>.
In opposit: if a point is needed to calculate a route, then this point is called routepoint and labeled <rtept>.
If a point is needed to draw a track, this point is called trackpoint and labeled <trkpt>.

Yes, we may wonder why they were called waypoints if they had nothing to do with the route nor the track.
Unfortunately, many navigation devices still cause confusion today because they use the terms inconsistently.

In MyRouteApp, these waypoints <wpt> are called Points Of Interest (POI). And yes, MyRouteApp contains an extensive library of such POIs that can be used in route planning. You can even enter manually single custom POIs, also import lists of POIs.

So MyRouteApp can handle this in a variety of ways.
This really leaves the question open - why the import routine for GPX files can’t handle this and display them together with the imported route or track.
Quite a few other apps can do this.

I know that I can import the contents of a GPX file into MyRouteApp in several steps and then merge them. But that’s an unnecessary amount of work (and prone to errors), for example, on the eve of a rally when you’re under time pressure.

Not sure about, but it looks like, all the technical basics are there in MyRouteApp - only the idea or the willing to use it for further development is missing...

[Bouke Ent]

perfect how you write it. i have the same question but maybe i was taking over.

i also realy want to know if wpt in a track file will be taken by MRA planner and MRA Next. it would be a great option. other options that are told here are in my eyes to difficult to do. beter is to import all information form gpx file and then ask what you want to import. only trackpoints or also wpt point with info (poi).

[Martin Wilcke]

@Bouke-Ent said in How to navigate a track?:

wpt in a track file

wpts are not part of a track file; that's a common misunderstanding. Unlike VIA points, that are part of a route, there is no link between wpts and tracks in any way even if they are part of the same GPX file.

[Bouke Ent]

@Martin-Wilcke said in How to navigate a track?:

@Bouke-Ent said in How to navigate a track?:

wpt in a track file

wpts are not part of a track file; that's a common misunderstanding. Unlike VIA points, that are part of a route, there is no link between wpts and tracks in any way even if they are part of the same GPX file.

wpt in a gpx means a single not to route or track point. when export a track and poi file in MRA a poi gets wpt in gpx file.

TopoGrafix

1. stand alone and are not related to a route or track. They are called waypoints and are labeled as <wpt>.
2. a point is needed to calculate a route, then this point is called routepoint and labeled <rtept>.
3. trackpoint and labeled <trkpt>.

[Martin Wilcke]

@Bouke-Ent

Yep, I know