@Con-Hennekens said in Integration of remote controllers:
@Guzzist said in Integration of remote controllers:
And I wonder what the better way is to integrate new controllers in the future...
To be honest, I think the most consumer-friendly way to support controllers is for MRA to add them to their list. Unfortunately it can take a while before a new controller gets adopted into the software though. Many controllers have their own software to program their hardware, which would counter anything you program yourself into some table most people would see as a hassle. Also, there are already apps like Key Mapper for Android that are able to convert controller commands to app commands.
Hi Con, I understand your thoughts. And I believe, if you are talking about "programming" it would be seen as hassle by users.
But my Idea is a bit different: our developers should create and fill the table with standard values, sent by the controller. So, the user sould only select his model - and it'swell working. Same as currentl. But - this is the point - If a user is willing to simply select another possible action, a button should initiate - he can do it.
Because many offroad drivers needs a dedicated "handsome" remote controller for the purpose of event. So, not each and every controller has the buttons on the best position for the fingers.
So, it would be highly sufficient, if the user can decide in the table, which button of the controller should do p.e. zoom in at the map in the App.