@Marinus-van-Deudekom Hallo Marinus, Goede tip om het eerste punt wat verder van mijn huis te plaatsen. Inderdaad stonden er aardig wat punten van de weg geplaatst. Bedankt voor je moeite, we gaan het zien! vrgr Robert

@Rajp said in Navigate as Track > Use all waypoints?: My concern is, when I skipped viapoint 1, why does it recalculate to the shortest path to viapoint 14, why not stick to the original track?? Because you explicitly skip to Via point 14. That's what that option does. If you want to honor the track, long-press at your own point of re-entry. It will guide you fastest way there. This is simply how it works. Maybe it helps if you look at it this way: skipping by pressing the skip WP button does not skip the previous WP, but it skips TO THE NEXT waypoint. but the track will still be honoured if you skip a viapoint/deviate off track (which is does not) Like I said earlier, if this is true you have a valid point. I have been asking questions about this in our test group, but are not able to test this myself currently. It does not align with my earlier experience of the "route as track" feature though.

Het gaat er ook niet om waarom er berekend wordt. Het gaat erom dat in een kwestie van een paar seconden 4 routepunten worden overgeslagen. Waar helemaal geen reden toe is. Uiteraard zou MRA moeten kunnen zien dat de route aan het einde van de weg samenkomt. Daar is het een navigatie voor. Dat ik over een weg rijd, waar ik niet komen mag volgens de kaart, doet er niet toe. De weg staat op de kaart en heeft zelfs een naam.

@Ralph-Janssen als ik al een probleem ervaar met navigeren is dat uitsluitend als ik AA gebruik. Tot nu toe nooit met MRA op mijn Thork T865X tablet. Als ik problemen ervaar met AA helpt het bij mij als ik mijn AA systeem in de auto reboot. Ik bemerk op het forum dat zeker niet alle AA devices dezelfde problemen hebben. Ik weet dat het de constante aandacht van onze Devs heeft en dat ze er hard aan werken om de problemen op te lossen

@Tony-Wilkins You're welcome - It's easy when you know how, everyday is a school day

@Adrian-Avram the only time I have seen an issue with long recalculation is when I deviated from a route and at the same left a WiFi connection. It took a long time for the phone to figure out that the WiFi connection was gone and switch to data. As a result I always navigate in offline mode.

@Leike-Lodiers Yes I have offline maps downloaded on the device.

@Con-Hennekens After a break of 3 weeks I navigated one of my standard routes again. Something has changed somewhere and the app doesn't work as it used to do. Something on a MRA server, my phone or on the here map. In my case none of the shaping points are skipped and I had to stop the app eventually. I have submitted a ticket so I hope the developers can have a look at it.

@Leike-Lodiers said in Off line maps set to off when updating: When i want to update the offline maps the setting for offline maps switch is set to off. Why can't this switch stay on while updating or set back to on when update is done. Saw this when i was navigating and not online and the navigation wouldn't recalculate. If you have selected the Offline navigation option, the app is offline. It needs to be online to check for map updates. So it’s just a couple of manoeuvres required to switch online, check for any map updates and then go back to switch to offline again. It is not necessary to check for map updates weekly, once a month or even longer is all that is required, so it really isn’t that much trouble to do. Most map updates are very small and the chances of them effecting your route is even smaller.

@M-Schrijver It didn't recalculate on my other routes (I have the setting to automatically recalculate set to off). Maybe the shaping point is closer to the main road than the points I had on previous routes. I totally agree that the app should not recalculate (with the recalculation set to off). When I have ignored instructions to drive a planned route then I can have made a conscious decision to do so and expect the app to be silent about the missed point(s), a non intrusive warning that I am deviating from the planned route would be fine. And as soon as I am back on the planned route the App should just forget about the point(s) which I skipped. Indeed when the app tries to send me back to the skipped point I miss the instructions to navigate to the next point. Eventually I hope that this behaviour can also be the behaviour for via points (when navigation a route as track) but that's for another time.

@Con-Hennekens Dankjewel... Zal de app opnieuw installeren, had ik nog niet gedaan.....

@Jesse-Van-Vilsteren-0 Fijn om te lezen! Binnenkort gaat ook het genereren van routes flink verbeterd zijn!

@LE-DIZES-Freddy J'ai mes paramètres à -15 et alors tout l'écran est visible

@Steve-2t said in Driving aimlessly: @RetiredWingMan It's a feature that used to exist but then disappeared and hasn't been seen since. Free ride/drive mode has never been a feature of MRA Navigation Next. It’s hoped that it will become a feature in the future.

@ginogino, The way you describe this is completely like the logic is programmed. When you deviate from the route (at WP2, to get gas), it takes 3 calculations to auto skip WP3, which in your case is 27km further in the route. It looks at the next 10 waypoints and decides which one is closest (calculated over the roads). If you just past WP2, it is not hard to imagine WP9 is closest, so it takes that one. This is exactly how the algorithm is intended. The real problem with the route is the lack of waypoints. If you deviate from a route to have a stop (whether gas, lunch or whatever), recalculations will occur. It is wise to look at the route before taking off again. You do not have to delete any waypoints, just long-press WP3 in order to set that as the new first WP to drive through.

@Adrian-Avram Your suggested solution is completely correct, but in this specific case, it's particularly difficult to explain why the deactivation might not work. As of mid-last year, it wasn't yet finally clear whether the pass would even be reopened. That's why I explicitly referred to it.

@ginogino you can see that the shortcut is not paved. [image: 1742911984197-2025-03-25_16h12_02.png]