Just noticed this should be in the Web section and not the App section. Maybe someone can move it?

Vi posso assicurare, soprattutto se fai percorsi molto lunghi, che poter rinumerare il wp sarebbe una cosa che renderebbe la programmazione più semplice tantissime volte, è evidente che se ti domandi il perché non ti è mai capitato di doverlo fare, ma ame invece capita sempre ad ogni costruzione di un percorso, quindi mi aggiungo alla lista di coloro che vorrebbero questa cosa nel nuovo planner

Dat bedoelde ik dus, je hebt alleen een viapunt aangelegd. POI's aanmaken is een extra handelingen zoals mijn grote vriend Hans heeft beschreven.

@Con-Hennekens It just a small file I use for testing: https://www.motorhotels.info/poi

I double checked it and indeed, sorting in the app, the order changes.

@Lenny-O said in Have a Track available along with the Route: Just a convenience thing. I don't think it really is a big deal to implement, is it? I think not indeed, but I don't think much development is being done on the current web application anymore. There is an entirely new web application in the making. Perhaps that one will contain this feature you are asking for (amongst many others! ).

Hey @Wallace-Shackleton , The waypoints list offers the km between the WP always added up. VG

Hi @Chris-Brooker as far as I know Gold is the top level of subscription for the route planner & allows access to all & every function within the route planner What level above Gold are you referring too? Are you asking about the MRA Navigation Next? https://www.myrouteapp.com/en/shop

De huidige werkwijze is vaak niet verkeerd totdat je ineens veel heen en weer wisselt en je dan merkt dat je constant instellingen moet wijzigen. Ik maakt een route met de TomTom kaart en TomTom layer. Vervolgens maak ik een route met de Here kaart en de Here layer. Ik ga weer terug naar de TomTom route maar deze staat nu op de here layer. Veranderd dus weer naar TomTom Layer. Maak wat wijzigingen en ga weer terug naar de Here route. Deze staat nu met de TomTom Layer. Dus die kan dus eerst weer terug zetten naar de Here layer. Hoogst irritant. Lijkt mij een kleine moeite dat er een aanpassing komt zodat de laatste gebruikte instelling bewaard wordt met de route.

@Mzokk Yes it is a pitty that MRA only uses the name field in the import. If you look at there export of GPX files they reference the garmin extensions but do not use them…. I am also transfering my tools van Excel to java script to not be depending on MS. I can make my POI and edit tracks in Java script but still need Basecamp to upload them into my garmin devices. I also expect the connectivity with the garmin devices is going intomthe background as the focus seems to be on the MRA routing app.

@Reinhard-Punz Please try to use the same language that the topic is using, this makes it easier for all to follow. Thanks

Thank You, that was most helpful. Steve

@Brian-McG I wonder if it's an issue with Oneplus then... Thanks for letting me know you had an issue but then it stopped. Mine started with 4.4.0. Don't know what changed.

@Nick-Carthew I do love when you can see a conversation thread with the discussion just being a bit out of sync & a little at cross purposes this post is in the "[Web] Suggestions and Discussion" section when @ian-davies-2 is asking about "a way to make these side roads bigger, brighter and easier to see while route planning" but he "forgot to mention its on the phone." as the original question is asking about maps & planning in the phone MRA Routeplanner, the map options that Ian may be interested in are those in the Menu > Map Style [image: 1757019560177-05d63a70-43d3-44cc-9a4d-805138a467a6-image.png] @ian-davies-2 you may be disappointed, none of the choices give a really really clear contrast for the small unclassified roads

@Nick-Carthew said in Full MyRoute-App CarPlay Map Integration in central instrument cluster: I thought that when you bought an Aston Martin, it comes with a bikini wearing girl sitting in the passenger seat reading you instructions from a map. I've seen it in 007. Well that actually would explain the price...

I have had the same idea (riding the MSD) on my radar for some time now. When following suggested trips, I always prefer tracks over routes as they stick closer to the original intention or, even better, use tracklogs - I like the idea of following someone's traces. @Richard-18 said in Is there any plan to allow the stitching together of tracks?: To do that, I need to convert the tracks into routes. The MSD Webpage includes links to all MSD parts, which lead to routes provided by Kurviger. Where did you get the tracks? @Richard-18 said in Is there any plan to allow the stitching together of tracks?: ...my question as to whether MyRoute’s owners had any plans to add ‘track stitching together’ in some future update. If they don’t and / or or people don’t see too much of a value in it. Even if editing tracks may not be part of a core planning task in MRA (where planning focuses on routes), MRA offers track navigation as well, and there are some capabilities for maintaining tracklogs. Therefore, IMHO, basic features such as splitting and merging tracks would be conceivable.

Thanks all. I knew the suggestions, however I like a |Finish flag at the end of the route. However I use now a red hand to suggest this is the end.

does not help you, but I do not have that problem. After importing the GPX1.1(route, track) I get 3 options. Import as a track, or as waypoints, or as support points. All seem to work but I prefer the waypoint option. I am using a Samsung S20. I usually have less than 15 points on a route.